
How to Improve Conversion Rates for Tour Operators
Bookings stall at checkout, not for lack of interest. This guide shows operators where demand gets lost — and how to fix the funnel, payment flow, and back office causing it.

A practical, step-by-step guide for tour and activity operators to convert more inquiries into paid direct bookings — covering checkout leaks, deposit plans, and OTA channel balance.
An inquiry lands in the inbox at 9 p.m. The traveler wants a trek, has picked dates, and is ready to pay a deposit. By morning someone replies with a PDF invoice and a payment link pasted into an email thread. The card details arrive two days later, or they don't, and the departure stays half full while the same trip keeps selling through an OTA at a steep cut.
That delay is where most direct sales die. Not on price. Not on the itinerary. On the gap between wanting the trip and being able to pay for it.
A direct booking is one where the traveler books and pays on the operator's own site, the money lands in the operator's own Stripe account, and the operator sets the payment and cancellation terms. A sound direct booking strategy leaves OTAs in place for discovery, where they do their best work. The aim is narrower and more practical: make the operator's own site the cheapest, easiest, and most trustworthy place to book for repeat guests, referrals, and anyone who has already found the business.
Travelers are already open to that route. In the 2024 survey of 1,500 consumers conducted for Wunderkind's Consumer Insights Report, 40% said they planned to book travel directly on brand websites, and 50% said they would book through online travel agencies. Trust ran the other way: 42% trusted offers from travel brands, against 24% who trusted agencies. The trust sits with the supplier. The booking still lands with the intermediary, mostly because the intermediary is easier to find and easier to pay.
The figures below are illustrative, not a promise about any operator's margins. Stripe bills its own processing fees separately on every channel.
Illustrative cost of selling direct versus through an OTA
| Scenario | Channel | Commission or fee | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-day trek, $4,500 per traveler | OTA at 20% effective commission | 20% | $900 per traveler |
| Multi-day trek, $4,500 per traveler | OTA at 30% effective commission | 30% | $1,350 per traveler |
| Multi-day trek, $4,500 per traveler | Direct through Samba | 2% | $90 per traveler |
| Day tour, $90 ticket, 40 travelers per week | OTA at 25% | 25% | $900 per week |
| Day tour, $90 ticket, 40 travelers per week | Direct through Samba | 2% | $72 per week |
The 2% rows use Samba's published pricing: 2% per booking, with the first $10,000 in bookings free of the fee. The operator chooses whether to absorb the 2% or add it to the traveler's total at checkout. The same 2% also applies to OTA bookings synced into Samba, so the OTA rows understate the real cost slightly; the gap between channels is still the commission. For the commission side, the breakdown of OTA commission rates shows where the 20% to 30% range comes from.
Every point of commission avoided is money an operator can put back into guides, equipment, and better trip pages instead of distribution.
Read that table as the whole case for direct sales. Nothing in it argues for switching OTA volume off. It argues that a booking which was coming anyway, from a returning guest or a referral, should not cost ten or fifteen times more to process than it has to.
Count the steps from interest to paid. Most operators have never timed their own booking path on a phone, so start there.
For each step, note the click count, the time on a phone, and whether a person must intervene. A conversion audit is only useful if it shows where in the funnel people drop off, not just how many started, so record the step where each traveler stalls. The same logic drives improving conversion on trip pages: fewer forced waits, fewer unanswered questions.
Common booking leaks, what they look like and how to fix them
| Leak | What it looks like | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Inquiry-only form | Traveler submits details and waits a day for a reply | Show live departures and a Book button on the trip page |
| Manual invoice | Staff email a PDF and hope the traveler pays | Take payment at checkout or send a payment link tied to the booking |
| Unclear availability | Traveler asks "is the 14th open?" by email | Show remaining capacity on each departure |
| No deposit option | A $3,000 trek requires full payment up front | Offer a deposit plus installment plan on long-lead trips |
| Off-brand checkout | Payment opens on a different-looking domain | Keep checkout on the operator's domain with logo, colors, and font |
| Mobile friction | Long forms and a tiny date picker on a phone | Use a short mobile-first path with only the fields needed to reserve |
| Pasted payment link | Link sits in an email thread with no booking record | Use a single booking record and a traveler portal for payments |
| Balance chasing | Balances tracked in a calendar and chased by hand | Set automatic balance reminders with a payment schedule |
Day tours usually lose people to friction: slow pages, extra fields, and a checkout that feels harder than the OTA version of the same tour. Multi-day trips usually lose people to uncertainty: no deposit option, unclear balance timing, and questions that sit unanswered overnight.
Fix the three worst leaks first. Everything else in a direct booking strategy (outreach, repeat-guest offers, content) depends on whether the page a traveler lands on can take a booking.
A traveler who lands on a trip page showing live departures, seats left, and price can book in one sitting. A blog post or email can only send that traveler somewhere. If the destination page ends in an inquiry form, the traffic work was wasted.
That's why the widget comes first. An embedded booking widget sits on each trip page and pulls live availability and pricing, so the site always matches what can be booked. The mechanics behind a booking engine widget on an operator's own site matter less than the result: checkout opens on the operator's own site and visitors stay there while booking.

Keeping checkout on the operator's own domain isn't cosmetic. Visitors stay on a brand they already decided to trust. The operator's own pages build their own traffic over time instead of feeding a marketplace listing. And the traveler data stays with the operator (contact details, booking history, and payment status) rather than arriving trimmed down from a third party.
Practical check: Preview the draft trip page exactly as a traveler sees it, on a phone, before publishing. Desktop previews hide the fields that break on small screens.
Private and custom trips don't fit instant booking, and they don't need to. An on-request booking handles them cleanly. The traveler asks, the operator accepts, and the booking then runs through the same payment plan and record as a standard departure. No parallel spreadsheet, no separate invoice chain.
A $90 city walk booked for tomorrow and a $4,500 trek booked five months out are different purchases. Forcing both through full payment at checkout is simple for the operator and expensive in lost bookings.
A deposit lowers the barrier on trips booked 90 or more days out because the traveler can commit while the trip is still months away. The deposit secures the seat, and the balance follows on a schedule agreed up front. Keep deposits, installment schedules, and departure-level pricing on a single booking record, so nothing needs reconciling across separate invoices. Save reusable payment-plan templates, such as a 30% deposit followed by two installments before departure, and apply them across trips instead of rebuilding terms each time. The mechanics of setting one up are covered in how to build an installment schedule.

Payment setup by trip type
| Trip type | Payment setup | Why it works |
|---|---|---|
| Day tour | Full payment at checkout | Low ticket and short lead time, so one payment is quick to take |
| Multi-day trip from $2,000 | Deposit plus one to three installments | Traveler commits early without paying the full ticket months ahead |
| Private or custom group | Payment link or on-request booking | Operator quotes first, then sends a link once the group agrees |
| Late booking close to departure | Plan re-balances so amounts add up | Traveler is not left with a balance that cannot be met in time |
When a trip is booked close to departure, the payment plan should re-balance itself so the amounts add up. A minor detail, until staff have recalculated a broken schedule by hand at short notice.
Failed payments are common, and most travelers try again. A 2025 study by Nuvei and Edgar, Dunn & Company, which surveyed more than 1,000 travelers across the US, UK, Spain, Brazil, and Hong Kong, found that 17% had experienced a failed payment attempt. Among them, 82% tried again and 18% abandoned the purchase completely. Most travelers will retry if the path back is obvious.
So make it obvious. Automatic balance reminders should include a failed-card notice that tells the traveler what happened and where to fix it, tied to the booking's own payment schedule. A self-service traveler portal lets guests pay a due or failed installment and update their card without emailing the office, and invoices, receipts, and credit notes should generate automatically on each payment, so a direct booking never waits on a manual PDF. Failed payment recovery walks through the retry sequence in more detail.
Manifest details belong after booking, not in the checkout form. Collect passports, dietary needs, waivers, and emergency contacts once the seat is paid for. A shorter checkout with operational detail gathered afterward serves both goals: more completed payments up front, less chasing later.
Check local deposit and balance-timing rules before choosing percentages. Some markets limit how much can be taken up front and how early a balance can be requested, so one global setting can create a compliance problem.
OTAs earn their cut when they introduce a traveler who would never have found the operator otherwise. They stop earning it when a returning guest books through them a second and third time out of habit. The answer is not to quit the channel. It is to keep the discovery and move every booking after the first one somewhere the operator controls.
The channel is big and growing. Arival's Global Operator Landscape research, based on a survey of more than 7,000 operators, found OTAs captured one third of tours, activities, and attractions bookings in 2024, up from 24% in 2019. Cutting that off would throw away genuine demand. A direct booking strategy keeps the discovery and changes where the next booking happens.

The OTA-to-direct moment is simple to run. Every traveler an OTA sends gets the operator's booking link in the confirmation, the receipt, and the post-trip follow-up, plus a returning-guest promo code they can share with friends. Set an expiry date on each code and keep codes off public listings, otherwise a loyalty gesture turns into a permanent price cut anyone can find.
On incentives, add value rather than undercut. A free add-on, a more flexible deposit, or priority access to popular departures gives a reason to book direct without touching the headline price. Before advertising any lower direct price, read the OTA partner terms for rate-parity clauses, including the detail covered in a breakdown of GetYourGuide commission. Contracts differ, and guessing is expensive.
Running both channels means one inventory. When bookings from Viator and GetYourGuide sync into the same back office as direct sales, availability, bookings, and passengers stay in one source of truth, and the same seat never gets sold twice. That matters most in the gap this whole strategy creates: the period where OTA discovery and growing direct demand run side by side, and a spreadsheet trying to reconcile the two is where double-bookings breed. A channel manager is the usual fix.
Set a baseline before changing anything. Without one, every improvement is a feeling and every dip is an argument.
Record direct share of bookings by month, split by trip type. A day tour and a $4,500 trek sell on different lead times and fail for different reasons. One blended rate hides both stories.
Metrics to track for direct booking
| Metric | How to calculate it | How often to check |
|---|---|---|
| Direct share of bookings | Direct bookings divided by all bookings, by trip type | Monthly |
| Revenue kept versus commission paid | Net direct revenue compared with OTA commission on the same trip type | Monthly |
| Checkout abandonment | Checkout starts without a paid booking, broken down by step | Weekly |
| Deposit take-up | Share of multi-day bookings that chose a deposit plan | Monthly |
| Balance completion | Share of installments paid on time for each departure | Per departure |
Counting clicks or inquiries isn't enough. A hotel study summarized by EHL Hospitality Business School analyzed more than 34,000 booking requests and found that what drives conversion shifts with demand conditions, so a single website metric read in isolation misleads. The operator-scale version of that discipline is connecting booking and payment records, so traffic that books but never pays a balance doesn't get counted as a win. Booking analytics covers which reports to pull.
Test a single variable at a time. Deposit on versus off. Fewer form fields. Remaining capacity shown versus hidden. A promo code for past guests.
An illustrative example with fictional numbers: a $3,000 trek requires full payment and converts 4 of 20 checkout starts. For one month it offers a deposit plus installments and converts a hypothetical 7 of 20. That gap, if real, pays for the admin of staged payments many times over. If it doesn't appear, switch the setting back.
Twenty checkout starts is a small sample, so before running a test, work out the sample size an experiment needs and don't mistake a handful of bookings for a trend. Run each test across a full departure cycle, report results by device and booking value, and revert the change if abandonment rises or revenue kept falls. When the payment option is a per-trip setting, reversing a test costs minutes, not a rebuild.
Treat the first month as the launch sprint and the next two as proof. Thirty days is enough to make the main trips bookable end to end. Ninety is enough to see whether direct share moved and which trips still earn their OTA commission.

Keep the first month cheap enough to be a test rather than a commitment. If the booking platform charges a percentage, check whether there is a free allowance at the start: on Samba's pricing, the first $10,000 in bookings carries no 2% fee.
Before going live, connect Stripe so payouts land in the operator's own account, then run a test booking on a real trip, on a phone, all the way to payment.
That is the strategy in working order. OTAs keep doing discovery. The operator's own site becomes the easiest place for anyone who already trusts the business to book in one sitting, pay on terms that fit the ticket, and return without an intermediary taking a cut of a relationship the operator already earned.
Put the booking widget on every trip page, offer deposits where the ticket calls for it, and let reminders plus the traveler portal handle balances instead of staff inboxes. Samba runs that plumbing on a free plan at 2% per booking, with the first $10,000 in bookings free of that fee and payouts going straight to the operator's own Stripe account. Start with one trip, run a test booking on a phone, and watch direct share by trip type from there.
No. OTAs earn their commission when they introduce a traveler who would never have found the operator otherwise, and Arival's research puts them at one third of tours, activities, and attractions bookings in 2024. The better move is to keep OTAs for discovery and pull every booking after the first one back to the operator's own site through confirmation links, post-trip emails, and returning-guest codes.
A deposit makes sense on higher-ticket trips booked 90 or more days out, such as multi-day trips from about $2,000. The traveler secures the seat early and pays the balance on a schedule agreed up front, for example a 30% deposit followed by two installments before departure. Day tours with a low ticket and a short lead time usually work best with full payment at checkout.
Walk your own booking path on a phone, step by step, from finding the trip page to getting confirmation. For each step, note the clicks, the time taken, and whether a staff member has to step in. Common leaks are inquiry-only forms, manual invoices, unclear availability, and long mobile forms. Fix the three worst before working on anything else.
Read your OTA partner terms for rate-parity clauses before you do, because contracts differ. A safer route is to add value rather than undercut: a free add-on, a more flexible deposit, or priority access to popular departures gives travelers a reason to book direct without changing the headline price. Keep returning-guest promo codes off public listings and give them an expiry date.
Track direct share of bookings each month, split by trip type, against a baseline recorded before any changes. Add revenue kept versus commission paid, checkout abandonment by step, deposit take-up on multi-day trips, and on-time balance completion per departure. Connect booking and payment records so a booking that never pays its balance is not counted as a win.

Founder & CEO
Related posts

How to Improve Conversion Rates for Tour Operators
Bookings stall at checkout, not for lack of interest. This guide shows operators where demand gets lost — and how to fix the funnel, payment flow, and back office causing it.

Booking Engine Widget for Tour Operators: A Practical Guide
The Book Now button is the easy part. Here's what has to work behind it — deposits, capacity, confirmations, and operational records.

Installment Schedule for Multi-Day Tours
Your final installment must arrive before your suppliers do — not just before guests leave. Four worked schedules show how to build a plan around real liabilities.
Keep the 20–30% you would hand an OTA
Samba gives tour and activity operators direct bookings on their own website, so you stop paying a marketplace 20–30% of every booking.